jurassic world

Jurassic World review

The film that continues to break every box office record known to Hollywood is on everyone’s mind. That film is of course Jurassic World, the 4th entry in the Jurassic Park series. However, this is actually considered to be the direct sequel to the 1993 original and this film completely ignores the sequels all together. To its credit, this is better than the two other sequels but as a whole, Jurassic World lacks any real soul outside of Chris Pratt and the dinosaurs themselves. Riddled with bad dialogue, predictable moments, and bad character types, Jurassic World feels so commercialized, similar to how the park is presented. The film’s appeal is simply the dinosaurs in action which will satisfy many but the flaws are just too much for me to look past. jurassic world 4

John Hammond’s dream of a park full of dinosaurs that everyone can see has come to life in the form of Jurassic World. It’s been open for 10 years and people have already begun to get bored with Dinosaurs according to the higher ups at Jurassic World. So the executives of Jurassic World have demanded for a new display to wow the public. The scientists have designed the Indominus Rex, a hybrid dinosaur that is essentially a bigger T-Rex with all the dangerous features of the meat-eating dinosaurs of the park. This is essentially suppose to be an analogy to the use of CGI in today’s cinema with moviegoers wanting it to see something bigger and cooler with CGI. So mayhem ensues the park (what a shocker!) and we follow Owen Grady (Chris Pratt) and Claire Dearing (Bryce Dallas Howard) as they try to ensure the safety of Claire’s nephews who always seem to be in the middle of this chaos.

It’s no shock to anyone reading this review that this is a very popular movie. As I am typing this, this film is the 3rd biggest film in the history of cinema! So obviously people loved this film very much and it’s quite understandable why. Similar to Universal’s Furious 7, the main appeal of action (in this case Dinosaurs for Jurassic World) overshadows any of the film’s shortcoming. I genuinely love the first Jurassic Park film, which still gives me goosebumps the first time the dinosaurs are revealed, yet this newest installment banks on commercializing that classic. The film’s riddled with cliches, unlikable characters, and just awful dialogue. The film does have a sense of fun, but with a lack of interest in most of these characters, why should I care if they survive?

jurassic world chris prattHollywood’s newest star at the moment, Chris Pratt salvages what he can of what is a genuinely boring character. We are given a few mentions about Grady’s past in the military and that he and Claire had a short fling for a period of time, but that’s about it in terms of character development. The rest of the time, Owen plays out like an unlikable Indiana Jones, lacking any sort of charisma or even humor that Pratt’s Star-Lord had. Pratt does what he can to seem likable but the script fails to give this character what he deserves. But when discussing characters, no character is more unlikable than Howard’s uptight, businesswoman Claire. Claire is absolutely unlikable and is quite frankly, a terrible human being. Howard’s character is a modern day ‘business woman’ with the cliche of being a workaholic, ultimately leaves her with no sympathy when her nephews are in danger. It’s admirable to see Howard run in high heels during many of the action sequences yet that doesn’t change the fact that Claire is so despicable, you can’t stand the fact that the film pushes the forced romance between her and Owen.

The film plays the audience as dumb for a lot of the movie, relaying on showing Jake Johnson’s character in a Jurassic Park T-Shirt in an attempt to be “meta” when instead it just feels like they are trying and failing to be like Phil Lord & Chris Miller. The film ignores the other sequels, but still manages to not come close in terms of the first film. The first film felt like an attempt to provide movie magic for the first time in an era where CGI dinosaurs were never thought of. Fast forward to 2015 where you see superheroes fight some new forgettable villain every other week or cars being able to avoid the laws of physics, seeing dinosaurs back on screen no longer has that same sense of awe that the original film had. Colin Trevorrow’s film pushes itself as an update to remind parents to show their kids a special experience and give those parents moments of nostalgia. In reality, this is Steven Spielberg making more money off of a property he once attempted to make something truly magical for it’s time.

Rating: D+

jurassic world poster

Featured Image -- 2447

Tom Holland Is the New Spider-Man, Jon Watts to Direct Film

Originally posted on Variety:

Marvel and Sony have found their Peter Parker.

“The Impossible” actor Tom Holland is set to play the web-slinging superhero in the next “Spider-Man” franchise. Jon Watts (“Cop Car”) will direct the film.

“I’ve worked with a number of up-and-coming directors who have gone on to be superstars and believe that Jon is just such an outstanding talent,” Tom Rothman, Sony Pictures Motion Pictures Group chairman, said in a press release. “For Spidey himself, we saw many terrific young actors, but Tom’s screen tests were special. All in all, we are off to a roaring start.”

The actor is first expected to make an appearance in “Captain America: Civil War” in order to properly introduce him into the Marvel film universe, with standalone films to follow on July 28, 2017.

[pmc-related-link href=”http://variety.com/2015/film/news/details-spider-man-appear-in-sony-and-marvel-movies-1201429039/” type=”See More:” target=”_blank”]Spider-Man: How Sony, Marvel Will Benefit from Unique Deal (EXCLUSIVE)[/pmc-related-link]

Sony announced a new partnership with…

View original 548 more words

Featured Image -- 2430

‘Jurassic World’ Beats ‘Avengers’ As The Fastest Pic To Cross $400M – Update With Top 20

Originally posted on Deadline:

9TH & 10th UPDATE, MONDAY, 2:30PM & 1PM: Universal made it official: Jurassic World has collected $402.8M in 10 days, the fastest film to hit that mark, beating Disney Marvel Avengers’ record of 14 days. JW is the highest grossing Jurassic Park title in the franchise stateside, surpassing the first title’s lifetime cume of $402.45M. With a second weekend of $106.6M (it fell 49% on 4,291 sites — which is soft by tentpole standards), JW also owns the record for the best second weekend of all-time, kicking Avengers’ ($103.05M second weekend) in the butt.

Next record to takeover: highest grossing film of the year, a record that Avengers: Age of Ultron currently owns with $449.4M. This weekend Universal continues its march on the domestic B.O. with the highly anticipated R-rated sequel, Ted 2. Will the studio beat itself at the B.O.? Will the dinosaurs bow out of the top spot and…

View original 5,491 more words

Featured Image -- 2428

Box Office: ‘Jurassic World’ Bites Into $102 Million, ‘Inside Out’ Scores With $91 Million

Originally posted on Variety:

These are the weekends that record-breaking summers are made of.

The North American box office sizzled as Disney and Pixar’s “Inside Out” and Universal’s “Jurassic World” duked it out at the multiplexes. After shattering records for domestic and international debuts, “Jurassic World” became only the second film in history to top $100 million in two separate weekends.

The dinosaur sequel nabbed first place with a massive $102 million, pushing its domestic total to $398.2 million. “Jurassic World” has now passed “Jurassic Park” ($357.1 million) as the highest-grossing domestic release in the franchise’s history when not adjusted for inflation.

[pmc-related-link href=”http://variety.com/2015/film/news/jurassic-world-records-box-office-1201520586/” type=”See More:” target=”_self”]‘Jurassic World’: Counting Down the Records It Demolished[/pmc-related-link]

Its dominance ended one of the most remarkable winning streaks in cinema history, putting a period to Pixar’s run of first place finishes. Every previous film released by the studio bowed in the top spot on domestic charts.

Not that…

View original 799 more words

Featured Image -- 2411

‘Jurassic World’ Topples ‘Avengers’ With Domestic Record $208.8M Bow

Originally posted on Deadline:

10th UPDATE, Monday 9:20 AM: Universal has made it official: Jurassic World has broken the North American, international and global records for an opening weekend. The final domestic number is $208.8M, which passes 2012’s Marvel’s The Avengers which ended its first frame with $207.4M. The dino dandy ended Sunday with a global total of $524.1M after a record $315.3M  start internationally. That total edges 2011’s Harry Potter And The Deathly Hallows: Part 2 which wrapped Frame 1 with $314M.

9th UPDATE, Monday, 7:51 AM:
Early morning estimates show that we have a new box office champion with Jurassic World besting The Avengers’ $207.4M domestic bow from 2012. By all accounts this AM, the dinosaurs stomped in with a $209M three-day opening; others have it just slightly lower, but they definitely took the crown. Congrats to Universal and what a wild ride it has been.

8th UPDATE, Sunday, 8:32 PM: When the dust…

View original 4,971 more words

Featured Image -- 2395

‘Ultron’ Has Super Second Weekend At $77.7M; ‘Hot Pursuit’ Opens To $13.9M – Final Box Office

Originally posted on Deadline:

Final update, Monday, 2:50 PM: In its second weekend, Disney/Marvel’s Avengers: Age of Ultron hauled in another $77.7M, which ended up being a 59% drop in its second frame. That is actually a strong hold considering that 15% of its first weekend gross came from the action hero cluster flick’s $27.5M Thursday preview. Opening in the No. 2 spot was Warner Bros.’ female buddy comedy Hot Pursuit turned in a little better Sunday than expected with weekend final of $13.9M.

Next weekend will be action-packed as Mad Max: Fury Road with Tom Hardy and Charlize Theron revs into theaters competing head to head with Pitch Perfect2 which is getting a significant amount of interest from the young female demo. Actually, right now, the audience make-up is quite similar, but the girls just may give Max a lesson in how opening weekend is done.

Here are the final grosses for this…

View original 3,489 more words


Avengers: Age of Ultron review

As John Heywood once said, “Rome wasn’t built in a day”. Of course in this case, Rome would be the equivalent of the Marvel Cinematic Universe. The end goal of Marvel Studios was to get these heroes to team up for the very first time and create this universe. The idea to team up all these heroes together after each of them getting their own film was never heard of. Sure the first X-Men or Fantastic Four films featured a team of heroes, but their origins pegged them together. In the case of 2012’s The Avengers, it was an idea that many were skeptical of every happening. It wasn’t until 2008 at the end of the original Iron Man when Samuel L. Jackson wanted to talk about the Avengers initiative. The rest is history as Marvel’s The Avengers not only worked, but soared both critically and financially. So, how do you top that? Naturally you must get bigger and set higher stakes which is what Joss Whedon does with Avengers: Age of Ultron. The film isn’t perfect by any means nor is it Marvel’s best yet but it is great and definitely better than its predecessor.

Since the events of The Avengers, Tony Stark (Robert Downey Jr.) seems obsessed with the black hole he threw a nuclear missile into to save New York and nearly died in, and wants to protect the world without having to fight. Stark and Bruce Banner (Mark Ruffalo) decide to create this Artificial Intelligent being named Ultron (voiced by James Spader) whose sole mission is to keep the world at peace. Unfortunately, this mission is taken in a different way as Ultron believes that the only way to achieve peace would be to end the human race. This forces the Avengers to assemble (sorry…) with Captain America (Chris Evans), Thor (Chris Hemsworth), Black Widow (Scarlett Johansson) Iron Man, Hulk, and Hawkeye (Jeremy Renner) again.

Avengers Age of Ultron

I’m going to be upfront here and say that while a lot of people loved the first Avengers film, I wasn’t one of them. I liked it a lot and own it even. Nevertheless, I felt that at times it wasn’t all that great like many thought it was. That film didn’t balance all the characters as well as I’d like and takes a while to kick start. In Age of Ultron, the film decides to kick start the action from the get-go. The action sequence is great as they attempt to fight this Hydra army in the forest, yet I felt like I needed more of an explanation there. This felt a little too quick to jump start but that’s simply a nitpick.

My real issue with the film is that the film feels too episodic, rather than feeling like a movie. This is really an issue with the MCU as a whole and unfortunately Avengers: Age of Ultron suffers a bit from that. The little moments that I loved from the first Avengers film aren’t as abundant. There are nice moments that further Hawkeye, Black Widow and Banner but the newcomers, Scarlett Witch (Elizabeth Olsen) and Quicksilver (Aaron Taylor Johnson) don’t get much other than a few moments of dialogue explaining their origins. They simply feel like pawns and never really add much in terms of character until the 3rd act. The other big issue I had was the Banner and Natasha romance as none of the previous films gave any sort of hints to this idea and it’s not even in the comics. It feels too forced at times, but there is a sense that since both of them are misfits in their own ways, that they would make a decent pair. Some won’t mind it but I just really get with this romance.

avengers age of ultron

The titular character, Ultron is wonderfully portrayed by James Spader who gives him a very charming personality. Ultron doesn’t seem to be that menacing villain who just wants to kill humanity, he is essentially Tony Stark gone evil. It’s noted that his personality lines up with Stark, which is a nod to the relationship between Stark, the creator and Ultron, his creation. The trailers all gave off this much darker vibe with Ultron as the villain, but ultimately it’s not that much darker. Granted it is much darker than the 1st film but nowhere near the darkness that DC movies seem to be. The only real issue I had with the titular villain would be that his origins felt rush. Once he becomes Ultron, I thought he was great but during the creation of Ultron and his birth, it never felt as organic as I’d like. Plus the situation with Ultron also brings up bigger, darker questions with the impact technology (i.e. Social Media, cell phones, laptops) has on our everyday life and whether humanity is actually hurting the world around us. The first film was simply a fun B-movie with the child-like admiration of putting all these heroes together but Whedon attempts to ask deep questions in this giant blockbuster.

The film’s action sequences are much better this time around as the beginning and final battles feature a one shot like sequence. Each action sequence never feels repetitive yet there is a sense of exhaustion with each battle. The Hulk vs Hulk-buster sequence and the final battle are pretty great and they also manage to say something to the Man of Steel lovers about saving the people during these battles. And the entire Avengers crew bounces off each other well, showing that the series has grown since the first time we saw all these guys grace the big screen.

Ultimately, Avengers: Age of Ultron is a worthy successor to its predecessor and for me, it’s better. The film has its issues and feels a bit rushed in the beginning but it’s a very entertaining, well-balanced blockbuster that never overstays its welcome. It does feel a bit episodic at times but that’s the after effects of the entire MCU. As a Marvel film, of course you have those moments that have to set up the future of the series and some never feel out of place while others do. If you are a big marvel fan, you’ll love it. If you aren’t, this movie won’t win you over. Ultimately, it’s great way to kick off the summer movie season and is better than the last 2 summer kick-off films as well.

Rating: B+


(Images via Box Office Mojo & Collider.com)